Court Affirms Nike Did Not Infringe Photo of Michael Jordan | Balough Law Offices
Supreme Court Won't Question Nike's Use of Michael Jordan Image - Bloomberg
JACOBUS RENTMEESTER v. NIKE, INC. COMPLAINT, Filed On 01/22/15 | PDF
Nike's Prevails in Copyright Lawsuit on the JUMPMAN Logo - YouTube
Expert Perspectives on Biggest Court Cases
Supreme Court Denies Nike 'Jumpman Logo' Case – WWD
Supreme Court Won't Hear Case on Nike's Use of Iconic Jordan Image | BoF
Nike Defeats Appeal Over Iconic Michael Jordan Photo, Jumpman Logo
Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc. – “Jumpman” may be falling down to Earth After waiting almost thirty years, a photographer now
Action Sought on Iconic Jordan Photo - Inventors Digest
Did you know that the iconic Air Jordan “Jumpman” logo was at the cent... | TikTok
Nike Prevails In Copyright Case As SCOTUS Rejects Review Of 'Jumpman' Logo - Above the Law
Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc. - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center
Nike wins against photographer in 30-year-old photo copyright case | PitchMark
MarkIt to Market® - March 2021: Art Imitating Art? | Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - JDSupra
The Art Lawyer's Diary September 2020 | The Hoffman Law Firm | NYC
United States Court Of Appeals NinthCircuit
JACOBUS RENTMEESTER v. NIKE, INC. COMPLAINT, Filed On 01/22/15 | PDF
Nike defeats appeal over iconic Michael Jordan photo, Jumpman logo | Reuters
Supreme Court Asked to Consider Iconic Michael Jordan Photograph
JORDAN v. QIAODAN: The Lessons of Trademark Enforcement in China | DuetsBlog ®
Jordan Logo Meaning, Designer, History | Nice Kicks
9th Circuit 'slam-dunks' claim of copyright infringement by Nike photograph of Michael Jordan and 'Jumpman' logo - The IPKat
Art Imitating Art? | Sterne Kessler
Update: Nike "Jumpman" Copyright Suit Bounces Off the Rim | The National Law Review
MarkIt to Market® - March 2021: Art Imitating Art? | Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. - JDSupra
Case Summary: Rentmeester v. Nike
